You are here: Home > Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
- 2011 Annual Report
- Management's Discussion and Analysis
- Report of independent registered chartered accountants
- Consolidated Financial Statements
- Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
- Note 20: Employee Benefit Plans
- Note 21: Other Non-Current Liabilities
- Note 22: Financial and Capital Management
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (20 to 22)
We, us, our, BCE and the company mean either BCE Inc. or, collectively, BCE Inc., its subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates; Bell means our Bell Wireline, Bell Wireless and Bell Media segments on an aggregate basis; and Bell Aliant means either Bell Aliant Inc. or, collectively, Bell Aliant Inc. and its subsidiaries.
NOTE 20 | EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS COST
We provide pension and other post-employment benefits for most of our employees. These include DB pension, DC pension, post-employment and long-term disability benefits. The cost of these plans, including financing, is tabled below.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 | 2011 | 2010 | ||
DB pension plans cost | (89 | ) | (193 | ) |
DC pension plans cost | (61 | ) | (47 | ) |
Post-employment benefits cost | (77 | ) | (79 | ) |
Long-term disability cost | (11 | ) | (12 | ) |
Less: | ||||
| 45 | 37 | ||
Net employee benefit plans cost | (193 | ) | (294 | ) |
COMPONENTS OF DB PLANS COST
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 | DB PENSION PLANS COST | POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS COST | LONG-TERM DISABILITY COST | TOTAL | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
Current service cost(1) | (220 | ) | (184 | ) | (5 | ) | (6 | ) | – | – | (225 | ) | (190 | ) | ||
Interest on obligations | (887 | ) | (894 | ) | (86 | ) | (86 | ) | (11 | ) | (12 | ) | (984 | ) | (992 | ) |
Expected return on plan assets | 1,018 | 885 | 14 | 13 | – | – | 1,032 | 898 | ||||||||
Employee benefit plans cost | (89 | ) | (193 | ) | (77 | ) | (79 | ) | (11 | ) | (12 | ) | (177 | ) | (284 | ) |
| (1) | Current service cost is included in operating costs in the income statements. |
The statements of comprehensive income includes the following amounts, before income taxes.
| 2011 | 2010 | |||
Cumulative losses recognized directly in equity, January 1 | (1,358 | ) | – | |
Actuarial losses in other comprehensive income(1) | (962 | ) | (1,432 | ) |
Decrease in the effect of the asset limit | 23 | 74 | ||
Cumulative losses recognized directly in equity, December 31 | (2,297 | ) | (1,358 | ) |
The cumulative actuarial losses recognized in the statements of comprehensive income is $2,394 million. |
COMPONENTS OF DB ACCRUED BENEFIT ASSET (LIABILITY)
The following table shows the change in accrued benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets.
| PENSION BENEFITS | POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS | LONG-TERM DISABILITY BENEFITS | TOTAL | |||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
Accrued benefit obligation, beginning of the year | (16,298 | ) | (14,391 | ) | (1,608 | ) | (1,394 | ) | (215 | ) | (203 | ) | (18,121 | ) | (15,988 | ) |
| (220 | ) | (184 | ) | (5 | ) | (6 | ) | – | – | (225 | ) | (190 | ) | ||
| (887 | ) | (894 | ) | (86 | ) | (86 | ) | (11 | ) | (12 | ) | (984 | ) | (992 | ) |
| (647 | ) | (1,770 | ) | (9 | ) | (198 | ) | (48 | ) | (24 | ) | (704 | ) | (1,992 | ) |
| 13 | – | – | – | – | – | 13 | – | ||||||||
| (420 | ) | – | (1 | ) | – | – | – | (421 | ) | – | |||||
| 992 | 947 | 77 | 76 | 27 | 24 | 1,096 | 1,047 | ||||||||
| (8 | ) | (6 | ) | – | – | – | – | (8 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
| 3 | – | (6 | ) | – | – | – | (3 | ) | – | ||||||
Accrued benefit obligation, end of the year | (17,472 | ) | (16,298 | ) | (1,638 | ) | (1,608 | ) | (247 | ) | (215 | ) | (19,357 | ) | (18,121 | ) |
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of the year | 14,835 | 13,069 | 209 | 191 | – | – | 15,044 | 13,260 | ||||||||
| 1,018 | 885 | 14 | 13 | – | – | 1,032 | 898 | ||||||||
| (244 | ) | 553 | (14 | ) | 7 | – | – | (258 | ) | 560 | |||||
| 329 | – | – | – | – | – | 329 | – | ||||||||
| (992 | ) | (947 | ) | (77 | ) | (76 | ) | (27 | ) | (24 | ) | (1,096 | ) | (1,047 | ) |
| 1,435 | 1,271 | 75 | 74 | 27 | 24 | 1,537 | 1,369 | ||||||||
| 8 | 6 | – | – | – | – | 8 | 6 | ||||||||
| (5 | ) | (2 | ) | – | – | – | – | (5 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Fair value of plan assets, end of the year | 16,384 | 14,835 | 207 | 209 | – | – | 16,591 | 15,044 | ||||||||
Plan deficit | (1,088 | ) | (1,463 | ) | (1,431 | ) | (1,399 | ) | (247 | ) | (215 | ) | (2,766 | ) | (3,077 | ) |
Effect of asset limit | (169 | ) | (192 | ) | – | – | – | – | (169 | ) | (192 | ) | ||||
Accrued benefit liability, end of the year | (1,257 | ) | (1,655 | ) | (1,431 | ) | (1,399 | ) | (247 | ) | (215 | ) | (2,935 | ) | (3,269 | ) |
Employee benefit asset included in other non-current assets | 31 | 33 | – | – | – | – | 31 | 33 | ||||||||
Employee benefit obligation | (1,288 | ) | (1,688 | ) | (1,431 | ) | (1,399 | ) | (247 | ) | (215 | ) | (2,966 | ) | (3,302 | ) |
| (1) | The actuarial losses include experience gains of $48 million in 2011 and experience losses of $81 million in 2010. |
| (2) | The actual return on plan assets was $774 million in 2011 and $1,458 million in 2010. |
FUNDED STATUS OF DB PENSION PLANS
The following table shows the funded status of our accrued benefit obligation.
| FUNDED | PARTIALLY FUNDED(1) | UNFUNDED(2) | ||||||||||
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Present value of accrued benefit obligation | (17,005 | ) | (15,846 | ) | (1,735 | ) | (1,697 | ) | (617 | ) | (578 | ) |
Fair value of plan assets | 16,360 | 14,815 | 231 | 229 | – | – | ||||||
Plan deficit | (645 | ) | (1,031 | ) | (1,504 | ) | (1,468 | ) | (617 | ) | (578 | ) |
Our unfunded plans consist of other post-employment benefit plans and long-term disability plans which are pay-as-you-go. |
SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS
We used the following key assumptions to measure the accrued benefit obligation and the net benefit plans cost for the DB pension plans and plans that provide other employee future benefits. These assumptions are long-term, which is consistent with the nature of employee benefit plans.
| PENSION BENEFITS | POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS | LONG-TERM DISABILITY COSTS | ||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
At December 31 | ||||||||||||
Accrued benefit obligation | ||||||||||||
| 5.1 | % | 5.5 | % | 5.1 | % | 5.5 | % | 5.1 | % | 5.5 | % |
| 3.0 | % | 3.0 | % | 3.0 | % | 3.0 | % | 3.0 | % | 3.0 | % |
For the year ended December 31 | ||||||||||||
Net benefit plans cost | ||||||||||||
| 5.5 | % | 6.4 | % | 5.5 | % | 6.4 | % | 5.5 | % | 6.4 | % |
| 7.0 | % | 7.0 | % | 7.0 | % | 7.0 | % | 7.0 | % | 7.0 | % |
| 3.0 | % | 3.0 | % | 3.0 | % | 3.0 | % | 3.0 | % | 3.0 | % |
We assumed the following trend rates in healthcare costs:
an annual increase of 4.5% in the cost per person of covered healthcare benefits for 2011 and the foreseeable future
an annual increase of 5.0% for retirees under age 65 and 4.5% for retirees over age 65 in the cost of medication for 2011 and the foreseeable future.
Assumed trend rates in healthcare costs have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the healthcare plans. The following table, for example, shows the effect of a 1% change in the assumed trend rates in healthcare costs.
| 1% INCREASE | 1% DECREASE | |||
Effect on other benefits – total service and interest cost | 7 | (6 | ) | |
Effect on other benefits – accrued benefit obligation | 147 | (127 | ) |
DISCOUNT RATE
We determine the appropriate discount rate at the end of each year. The following table shows the impact of a 0.5% increase and a 0.5% decrease in the discount rate on the net employee benefit plans cost for 2012 and the employee benefit obligation at December 31, 2012.
| IMPACT ON NET EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS COST FOR 2012 INCREASE/(DECREASE) | IMPACT ON EMPLOYEE BENEFIT OBLIGATION AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 INCREASE/(DECREASE) | |||
Discount rate increased to 5.6% | ||||
| 3 | (940 | ) | |
| (1 | ) | (18 | ) |
| – | (29 | ) | |
| (1 | ) | (233 | ) |
| 1 | (1,220 | ) | |
Discount rate decreased to 4.6% | ||||
| (8 | ) | 998 | |
| 1 | 19 | ||
| – | 31 | ||
| (1 | ) | 247 | |
| (8 | ) | 1,295 |
EXPECTED LONG-TERM RATE OF RETURN
We determine the appropriate expected long-term rate of return at the end of each year. The following table shows the impact of a 0.5% increase and a 0.5% decrease in the expected rate of return on pension plan assets on the net employee benefit plans cost for 2012 and the employee benefit obligation at December 31, 2012.
| IMPACT ON NET EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS COST FOR 2012 INCREASE/(DECREASE) | IMPACT ON EMPLOYEE BENEFIT OBLIGATION AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 INCREASE/(DECREASE) | |||
Expected rate of return increased to 7.5% | ||||
| (62 | ) | (62 | ) |
| (1 | ) | (1 | ) |
| (2 | ) | (2 | ) |
| (16 | ) | (16 | ) |
| (81 | ) | (81 | ) |
Expected rate of return decreased to 6.5% | ||||
| 62 | 62 | ||
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 2 | ||
| 16 | 16 | ||
| 81 | 81 |
PENSION PLAN ASSETS
The investment strategy for the major pension plans is to maintain a diversified portfolio of assets, invested in a prudent manner to maintain the security of funds while maximizing returns within our guidelines. The expected rate of return assumption is based on our target asset allocation policy and the expected future rates of return on these assets.
The following table shows the allocation of our pension plan assets at December 31, 2011 and 2010, target allocations for 2011 and the expected long-term rate of return by asset class.
| WEIGHTED AVERAGE TARGET ALLOCATION | PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PLAN ASSETS FAIR VALUE AT DECEMBER 31 | WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXPECTED LONG-TERM RATE OF RETURN | ||||||
ASSET CATEGORY | 2011 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | ||||
Equity securities | 35% – 55 | % | 40 | % | 45 | % | 9.5 | % |
Debt securities | 45% – 65 | % | 60 | % | 55 | % | 4.5 | % |
Total/average | 100 | % | 100 | % | 7.0 | % | ||
Equity securities included approximately $9 million of BCE common shares and Bell Aliant common shares, or 0.05% of total plan assets, at December 31, 2011 and approximately $19 million of BCE common shares and Bell Aliant units, or 0.1% of total plan assets, at December 31, 2010.
Debt securities included approximately $19 million of Bell Canada debentures or 0.12% of total plan assets, at December 31, 2011 and approximately $6 million of Bell Canada debentures, or 0.04% of total plan assets, at December 31, 2010.
CASH FLOWS
We are responsible for adequately funding our DB pension plans. We make contributions to them based on various actuarial cost methods that are permitted by pension regulatory bodies. Contributions reflect actuarial assumptions about future investment returns, salary projections and future service benefits.
We contribute to the DC pension plans as employees provide service.
The following table shows the amounts we contributed to the DB and DC pension plans and the payments made to beneficiaries under other employee future benefit plans.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 | PENSION BENEFITS | OTHER BENEFITS | ||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||
Bell Canada | (1,055 | ) | (1,168 | ) | (93 | ) | (90 | ) |
Bell Media | (30 | ) | – | – | – | |||
Bell Aliant | (406 | ) | (147 | ) | (9 | ) | (8 | ) |
Total | (1,491 | ) | (1,315 | ) | (102 | ) | (98 | ) |
Comprised of: | ||||||||
| (1,435 | ) | (1,271 | ) | (102 | ) | (98 | ) |
| (56 | ) | (44 | ) | – | – | ||
| (1) | Includes voluntary contributions of $1,065 million in 2011 and $750 million in 2010. |
We expect to contribute approximately $265 million to our DB pension plans in 2012, subject to actuarial valuations being completed. We expect to pay approximately $110 million to beneficiaries under other employee benefit plans and to contribute approximately $70 million to the DC pension plans in 2012.
NOTE 21 | OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
NOTE | DECEMBER 31, 2011 | DECEMBER 31, 2010 | JANUARY 1, 2010 | |||||
CRTC deferral account obligation | 22 | 304 | 295 | 382 | ||||
Deferred revenue on long-term contracts | 129 | 127 | 115 | |||||
Future tax liabilities | 326 | 537 | 726 | |||||
CRTC tangible benefits obligation | 4, 22 | 174 | – | – | ||||
Other | 408 | 343 | 508 | |||||
Total other non-current liabilities | 1,341 | 1,302 | 1,731 |
NOTE 22 | FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Management’s objectives are to protect BCE and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis against material economic exposures and variability of results against various financial risks that include credit risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk, foreign currency risk and equity price risk.
DERIVATIVES
We use derivative instruments to manage our exposure to foreign currency risk, interest rate risk and changes in the price of BCE common shares under our share-based payment plans. We do not use derivative instruments for speculative purposes, as such we are not exposed to any significant liquidity risks relating to them.
The following derivative instruments were outstanding at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010:
cross-currency swaps and foreign currency forward contracts that hedge foreign currency risk on a portion of our long-term debt
foreign currency forward contracts that manage the foreign currency risk of certain purchase commitments
interest rate swaps that hedge interest rate risk on a portion of our long-term debt
forward contracts on BCE common shares that mitigate the cash flow exposure related to share-based payment plans.
For fair value hedges, the gains recognized on the hedging instruments were $36 million and $5 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively, and the losses recognized on the positions hedged were $42 million and $9 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively.
CREDIT RISK
We are exposed to credit risk from operating activities and certain financing activities, the maximum exposure of which is represented by the carrying amounts reported on the statements of financial position.
We are exposed to credit risk if counterparties to our trade receivables and derivative instruments are unable to meet their obligations. The concentration of credit risk from our customers is minimized because we have a large and diverse customer base. We regularly monitor our credit risk and credit exposure. There was minimal credit risk relating to derivative instruments at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010. We deal with institutions that have strong credit ratings and as such we expect that they will be able to meet their obligations.
The following table provides the change in allowance for doubtful accounts for trade receivables.
| AT DECEMBER 31 | 2011 | 2010 | ||
Balance, beginning of the year | (95 | ) | (105 | ) |
Additions | (105 | ) | (20 | ) |
Use | 100 | 30 | ||
Acquisition through business combinations | (5 | ) | – | |
Balance, end of the year | (105 | ) | (95 | ) |
For many of our customers, trade receivables are written off directly to bad debt expense if the account has not been collected after a predetermined period of time.
The following table provides further details on trade receivables not provisioned.
| DECEMBER 31, 2011 | DECEMBER 31, 2010 | JANUARY 1, 2010 | ||||
Trade receivables not past due | 2,170 | 1,945 | 1,890 | |||
Trade receivables past due and not provisioned | ||||||
| 361 | 284 | 216 | |||
| 390 | 196 | 209 | |||
| 43 | 100 | 129 | |||
Trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts | 2,964 | 2,525 | 2,444 |
LIQUIDITY RISK
We generate enough cash from our operating activities to fund our operations and fulfill our obligations as they become due. We have sufficient committed bank facilities in place should our cash requirements exceed cash generated from our operations.
Financial liabilities that are due within one year have been classified as current in the statements of financial position.
The following table is a maturity analysis for recognized financial liabilities with maturities that are greater than one year at December 31, 2011 for each of the next five years and thereafter.
| AT DECEMBER 31, 2011 | NOTE | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | THEREAFTER | TOTAL | ||||||||
Long-term debt | 547 | 89 | 1,870 | 1,375 | 1,217 | 6,479 | 11,577 | |||||||||
Notes payable and bank advances | 321 | – | – | – | – | – | 321 | |||||||||
Minimum future lease payments under finance leases | 13 | 417 | 381 | 239 | 186 | 174 | 1,468 | 2,865 | ||||||||
Loan secured by trade receivables | 950 | – | – | – | – | – | 950 | |||||||||
Interest payable on long-term debt, notes payable and bank advances | 666 | 622 | 562 | 498 | 438 | 4,961 | 7,747 | |||||||||
Net interest receipts on derivatives | (23 | ) | (22 | ) | (26 | ) | (22 | ) | (19 | ) | (9 | ) | (121 | ) | ||
Total | 2,878 | 1,070 | 2,645 | 2,037 | 1,810 | 12,899 | 23,339 |
MARKET RISK
Currency Exposures
We use cross-currency swaps and foreign currency forward contracts to hedge debt that is denominated in foreign currencies. We also use foreign currency forward contracts to manage foreign currency risk related to anticipated transactions, including certain purchase commitments.
At December 31, 2011, the amounts to be received under foreign currency forward contracts were US$1,323 million (2010 – US$1,280 million) and the amounts to be paid were $1,329 million (2010 – $1,333 million).
The effect on net earnings of a 10% increase or decrease in the Canadian/US dollar exchange rate was not significant at December 31, 2011, with all other variables held constant. The effect on other comprehensive income of a 10% change in the Canadian/US dollar exchange rate on the value of our foreign currency forward contracts was $80 million at December 31, 2011, with all other variables held constant.
The following table provides further details on our outstanding cross-currency swaps and foreign currency forward contracts as at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010.
TYPE OF | BUY | AMOUNTS TO RECEIVE IN USD | SELL CURRENCY | AMOUNTS TO PAY IN CAD | MATURITY | HEDGED ITEM | ||
| At December 31, 2011 | Cash flow | USD | 659 | CAD | 668 | 2012 | Purchase commitments | |
| Cash flow | USD | 380 | CAD | 373 | 2013 | Purchase commitments | ||
| Cash flow | USD | 70 | CAD | 70 | 2014-2017 | Purchase commitments | ||
| Economic | USD | 200 | CAD | 194 | 2012 | Purchase commitments | ||
| Economic | USD | 14 | CAD | 24 | 2013 | Long-term debt | ||
| 1,323 | 1,329 | |||||||
| At December 31, 2010 | Cash flow | USD | 43 | CAD | 60 | 2011 | Debt due within one year | |
| Cash flow | USD | 14 | CAD | 24 | 2013 | Long-term debt | ||
| Cash flow | USD | 603 | CAD | 617 | 2011 | Purchase commitments | ||
| Cash flow | USD | 485 | CAD | 496 | 2012 | Purchase commitments | ||
| Economic | USD | 135 | CAD | 136 | 2011 | Purchase commitments | ||
| 1,280 | 1,333 | |||||||
| At January 1, 2010 | Fair value | USD | 200 | CAD | 269 | 2010 | Debt due within one year | |
| Cash flow | USD | 10 | CAD | 14 | 2010 | Debt due within one year | ||
| Cash flow | USD | 43 | CAD | 60 | 2011 | Long-term debt | ||
| Cash flow | USD | 14 | CAD | 24 | 2013 | Long-term debt | ||
| Cash flow | USD | 575 | CAD | 647 | 2010 | Purchase commitments | ||
| Economic | USD | 125 | CAD | 132 | 2010 | Purchase commitments | ||
| 967 | 1,146 |
Interest Rate Exposures
We use interest rate swaps to manage the mix of fixed and floating interest rates of our debt. The effect on net earnings and other comprehensive income of a 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates was $11 million at December 31, 2011, with all other variables held constant. The following table shows interest rate swaps outstanding at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010.
| TYPE OF HEDGE | NOTIONAL AMOUNT | RECEIVE INTEREST RATE | PAY INTEREST RATE | MATURITY | HEDGED ITEM | |||||||
| At December 31, 2011 | Fair value | 700 | 5.00 | % | 3-month CDOR(1)+ 0.42 | % | 2017 | Long-term debt | ||||
| At December 31, 2010 | Fair value | 700 | 5.00 | % | 3-month CDOR + 0.42 | % | 2017 | Long-term debt | ||||
| At January 1, 2010 | Fair value | 700 | 5.00 | % | 3-month CDOR + 0.42 | % | 2017 | Long-term debt | ||||
| Fair value | USD 200 | 9.50 | % | 3-month CDOR + 5.34 | % | 2010 | Debt due within one year |
Canadian dollar offered rate |
Equity Price Exposures
We use equity forward contracts to economically hedge the cash flow exposure of BCE’s common shares related to share-based payment plans. See Note 24, Share-Based Payments for details on our share-based payment arrangements.
The effect on net earnings of a 10% change in the market price of BCE’s common shares was $26 million at December 31, 2011, with all other variables held constant.
FAIR VALUE
Fair value is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction.
Certain fair value estimates are affected by assumptions we make about the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows and discount rates, all of which reflect varying degrees of risk. Income taxes and other expenses that would be incurred on disposition of financial instruments are not reflected in the fair values. As a result, the fair values are not the net amounts that would be realized if these instruments were settled.
The carrying value of our cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables, trade payables and accruals, compensation payable, interest payable and short-term obligations approximates fair value because they are short-term.
The following table provides the fair value details of financial instruments measured at amortized cost in the statements of financial position.
| DECEMBER 31, 2011 | DECEMBER 31, 2010 | JANUARY 1, 2010 | ||||||||||
| CARRYING VALUE | FAIR VALUE | CARRYING VALUE | FAIR VALUE | CARRYING VALUE | FAIR VALUE | |||||||
CRTC deferral account obligation | 367 | 387 | 591 | 603 | 534 | 531 | ||||||
CRTC tangible benefits obligation | 236 | 239 | – | – | – | – | ||||||
Long-term debt | 12,743 | 14,668 | 10,821 | 12,061 | 9,877 | 10,928 | ||||||
The following table provides the fair value details of financial instruments measured at fair value in the statements of financial position at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010.
| ASSETS | LIABILITIES | DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, NET ASSET (LIABILITY) POSITION | ||||||||||||||||
| AFS PUBLICLY- TRADED SECURITIES | AFS PRIVATELY- HELD SECURITIES | LONG- TERM DEBT | FUND UNIT LIABILITY | FORWARD CONTRACTS – BCE SHARES | CURRENCY SWAPS – CASH FLOW HEDGE | CROSS- CURRENCY SWAP – FAIR VALUE HEDGE | ECONOMIC HEDGES | INTEREST RATE SWAPS | ||||||||||
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | 33 | 813 | – | 94 | 22 | – | 1 | 116 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||
| – | – | 813 | – | 94 | 22 | – | 1 | 116 | |||||||||
| – | 33 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 12 | 260 | 771 | 3,060 | 114 | (47 | ) | – | (1 | ) | 80 | |||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
| 12 | – | – | 3,060 | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||
| – | – | 771 | – | 114 | (47 | ) | – | (1 | ) | 80 | |||||||
| – | 260 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||
January 1, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 126 | 266 | 969 | 3,104 | 35 | (73 | ) | (56 | ) | – | 68 | |||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
| 126 | – | – | 3,104 | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||
| – | – | 969 | – | 35 | (73 | ) | (56 | ) | – | 68 | |||||||
| – | 266 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||
Valued using quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments |
Valued using observable market data such as equity prices, interest rates, swap rate curves and foreign currency exchange rates |
Valued using non-observable market inputs such as discounted cash flows and other internal models |
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
We have various capital policies, procedures and processes which are utilized to achieve our objectives for capital management. These include optimizing our cost of capital and maximizing shareholder return while balancing the interests of our stakeholders.
Our definition of capital includes equity attributable to owners of the parent, debt, and cash and cash equivalents.
In order to meet our objectives of maintaining a net debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio of between 1.5 and 2.0 times and an Adjusted EBITDA to net interest expense ratio greater than 7.5 times, we monitor our capital structure and make adjustments, including to our dividend policy, as required.
In 2011, the board of directors of BCE approved increases in the annual dividend on BCE’s common shares as follows:
5.1%, from $1.97 per common share to $2.07 per common share in May 2011
4.8%, from $2.07 per common share to $2.17 per common share in December 2011.
On February 9, 2012, the board of directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.5425 per common share, payable on April 15, 2012 to shareholders of record at March 15, 2012.
In 2010, the board of directors of BCE approved increases in the annual dividend on BCE’s common shares as follows:
5.2%, from $1.74 per common share to $1.83 per common share in August 2010
7.7%, from $1.83 per common share to $1.97 per common share in December 2010.
The details of BCE’s 2011 and 2010 normal course issuer bids (NCIB) are set out in Note 23, Share Capital.
The following table summarizes some of our key ratios used to monitor and manage Bell Canada’s capital structure. These ratios are calculated for BCE, excluding Bell Aliant.
| AT DECEMBER 31 | 2011 | 2010 | ||
| 2.0 | 1.7 | |||
Adjusted EBITDA to net interest expense(3) | 9.1 | 10.7 |
We define net debt as debt due within one year plus long-term debt and 50% of preferred shares less cash and cash equivalents. |
Adjusted EBITDA, as also defined in our credit agreement, is EBITDA including dividends/distributions from Bell Aliant to BCE. |
Net interest expense excludes interest on employee benefit obligations and interest expense on fund unit liability, and includes 50% of preferred dividends. |